Flames Game Recaps

Flames Visual Recap 49: Calgary ends homestand with a win to snap losing streak heading into All-Star break

The Calgary Flames were trying to get back into the win column after losing four games in a row in regulation on home ice. With just one game remaining in the homestand and before the All-Star break, the Flames put forth a poor performance against the lowly Chicago Blackhawks, but a shutout from Jacob Markstrom did the job for the team.

Notes and discussion from the charts are all below, read on to see it all!

Game events

  • Based on the traditional stats, things looked even between the two teams, which in itself is a problem for Calgary if they’re even with Chicago.
  • The Flames were outright putrid in the first period and were lucky to have the score tied at zero. Chicago had many high-danger shots that were turned away by Markstrom.

Goals

GoalAssistsTimeScore
Elias Lindholm (PPG)Yegor Sharangovich, Nazem Kadri15:55 | 2ndCHI 0 – 1 CGY
  • Elias Lindholm scored his first goal since December 21, which was also a power play goal. Lindholm hasn’t scored a 5v5 goal since December 2.

Follow TWC on social media!


All situations Corsi

  • From shot attempts alone, the two teams looked even, and in fact, the Flames pulled away in the third period.
  • The Flames didn’t have much structure and they didn’t get that many high-danger shots at all. This is partly due to the line changes that Ryan Huska cooked up.
  • By the final buzzer, the two teams looked even enough in terms of shot share and danger levels, but the lone goal power play by Calgary was the difference-maker, obviously.

5v5 Corsi

  • The Flames’ third period set them apart from the Blackhawks, and it was definitely a response from a team that was desperate to not lose five in a row on home ice. It worked out for Calgary in the end.
  • Shot location charts like this kind of indicate neither team had particularly good games at 5v5. There’s too much sparseness in the high-danger areas and also no goals were scored at even strength.
  • That can be chalked up to good defence, bad offence, or both.
  • Astoundingly, both teams combined for eight shots in the neutral zone at 5v5(!!)

Do you have any feedback or suggestions? Let us know in the comments or on Twitter @wincolumnCGY.

Back to top button

Discover more from The Win Column

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading